BNO vs. USCI
BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) and USCI (United States Commodity Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil, while USCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BNO returned 13.60%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for USCI. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNO charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for USCI.
Performance
BNO vs. USCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 90.47% return, which is significantly higher than USCI's 28.22% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has outperformed USCI with an annualized return of 13.60%, while USCI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.86% annualized return.
BNO
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -10.29%
- YTD
- 90.47%
- 6M
- 86.00%
- 1Y
- 91.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 24.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
USCI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 6M
- 26.35%
- 1Y
- 40.33%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
BNO vs. USCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 90.47% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 35.25% | 62.34% | -38.23% | 36.01% | -15.30% | 15.43% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 28.22% | 17.63% | 17.24% | -0.00% | 29.47% | 33.07% | -11.47% | -1.68% | -11.76% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNO and USCI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2010 | 0.63 |
The correlation between BNO and USCI shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNO vs. USCI — Risk / Return Rank
BNO
USCI
BNO vs. USCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNO | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 4.64 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 16.18 | -6.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNO | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.43 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.05 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.56 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.30 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BNO vs. USCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than USCI's maximum drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and USCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNO | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -66.41% | -20.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.87% | -8.73% | -9.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.75% | -12.01% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | -18.84% | -14.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -45.82% | -29.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.29% | -3.10% | -7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.17% | -29.51% | -10.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.45% | 2.50% | +6.95% |
Volatility
BNO vs. USCI - Volatility Comparison
United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI) at 4.51%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNO | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.22% | 4.51% | +9.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.10% | 13.93% | +22.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.46% | 16.70% | +24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 18.44% | +16.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.68% | 15.85% | +20.83% |
BNO vs. USCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than USCI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNO vs. USCI - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNO nor USCI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNO and USCI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to USCI (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNO dropped -87.06% vs USCI's -66.41%.
On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 8.86% for USCI. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, USCI has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.
BNO and USCI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BNO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while USCI is Commodities. BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil, while USCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BNO and 1.03% for USCI.
USCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNO and USCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer