PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNO vs. OIH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNO vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNO vs. OIH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.72%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
39.12%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 77.72% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's 39.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has outperformed OIH with an annualized return of 15.62%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively lower -1.01% annualized return.


BNO

1D
-3.23%
1M
34.79%
YTD
77.72%
6M
69.06%
1Y
62.25%
3Y*
23.72%
5Y*
25.28%
10Y*
15.62%

OIH

1D
-1.99%
1M
0.18%
YTD
39.12%
6M
52.22%
1Y
51.45%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
16.68%
10Y*
-1.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNO vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNO vs. OIH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNO vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNOOIHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.36

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.33

1.85

+0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.06

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.02

5.70

+0.32

BNO vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNO and OIH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNOOIHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.36

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.45

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

-0.02

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

-0.00

+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BNO and OIH is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BNO vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.23%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Drawdowns

BNO vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, smaller than the maximum OIH drawdown of -94.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and OIH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNOOIHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

-94.45%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.48%

-26.13%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-43.80%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-89.62%

+14.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-64.72%

+57.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-48.75%

+8.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.26%

9.43%

+0.83%

Volatility

BNO vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 20.48% compared to VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) at 8.53%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNOOIHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.48%

8.53%

+11.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

21.79%

+6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.84%

38.09%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.91%

37.48%

-3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.11%

42.49%

-6.38%