BNO vs. BINC
BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. BNO is passively managed, while BINC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BNO returned 17.61%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for BINC. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. BNO charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
BNO vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 43.86% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.33% return.
BNO
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -25.93%
- YTD
- 43.86%
- 6M
- 41.93%
- 1Y
- 39.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
BINC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNO vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 43.86% | -5.44% | 9.67% | 6.85% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.33% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNO and BINC is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023 | -0.15 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BNO and BINC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.15 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNO vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
BNO
BINC
BNO vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNO | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.99 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.18 | 7.75 | -3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNO vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNO | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -2.69% | -84.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.25% | -2.69% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.25% | -2.69% | -29.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -0.07% | -32.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -0.36% | -39.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.47% | 0.69% | +8.78% |
Volatility
BNO vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.58%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNO | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 0.58% | +10.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.57% | 1.88% | +35.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.20% | 2.29% | +38.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.70% | 2.99% | +32.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 2.99% | +33.71% |
BNO vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNO vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNO and BINC have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to BINC (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNO dropped -87.06% vs BINC's -2.69%.
On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 17.61% vs 7.13% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 17.61% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.
BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
BNO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: USCF Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BNO and 0.40% for BINC.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNO and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer