PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNKU.L is traded in USD, while XSFN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSFN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


BNKU.L

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XSFN.L

1D
1.08%
1M
7.02%
6M
8.12%
YTD
4.52%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.37K$205.21K$139.69K

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BNKU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%28.68%-7.96%36.49%-19.86%
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
4.52%15.97%30.96%14.25%-12.62%37.49%-4.02%33.06%-14.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU.L and XSFN.L is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2018

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XSFN.L
XSFN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XSFN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSFN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKU.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D (XSFN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNKU.LXSFN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKU.LXSFN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

Volatility

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKU.LXSFN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSFN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNKU.L vs. XSFN.L - Dividend Comparison

BNKU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSFN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BNKU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 Banks UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSFN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Financials UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.14%1.10%1.67%2.55%1.31%1.32%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNKU.L and XSFN.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSFN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSFN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BNKU.L.

BNKU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Banks and Diversified Financials Select Index, while XSFN.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BNKU.L and 0.12% for XSFN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKU.L and XSFN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer