BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO
BNKL.TO (Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and ZUB.TO (BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, BNKL.TO returned 45.31%/yr vs 27.94%/yr for ZUB.TO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 41.88% return, which is significantly higher than ZUB.TO's 11.96% return.
BNKL.TO
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 40.22%
- YTD
- 41.88%
- 1Y
- 92.78%
- 3Y*
- 45.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZUB.TO
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 27.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 41.88% | 55.98% | 29.92% | 7.40% |
ZUB.TO BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 11.96% | 20.24% | 33.07% | 15.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKL.TO and ZUB.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BNKL.TO
ZUB.TO
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNKL.TO | ZUB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.02 | 1.21 | +0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 1.37 | +7.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.46 | 3.72 | +33.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum ZUB.TO drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and ZUB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKL.TO | ZUB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -55.05% | +36.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -17.10% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.58% | -27.33% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.52% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -14.10% | +11.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 6.29% | -3.80% |
Volatility
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZUB.TO) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKL.TO | ZUB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.88% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 15.26% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 20.70% | -4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 27.85% | -12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 30.14% | -14.33% |
Dividends
BNKL.TO vs. ZUB.TO - Dividend Comparison
BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than ZUB.TO's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.58% | 3.40% | 4.39% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUB.TO BMO Equal Weight US Banks Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 1.75% | 1.96% | 2.29% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 1.88% | 2.57% | 2.13% | 1.92% | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKL.TO and ZUB.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO.
Find the right allocation for BNKL.TO and ZUB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer