PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF (HUBL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 41.35% return, which is significantly higher than HUBL.TO's 10.67% return.


BNKL.TO

1D
1.37%
1M
3.03%
6M
43.17%
YTD
41.35%
1Y
91.67%
3Y*
43.93%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
44.60%

HUBL.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
1.12%
6M
8.42%
YTD
10.67%
1Y
27.45%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$139.79KCA$99.16KCA$91.40K
CA$25.85KCA$32.62KCA$50.41K

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
41.35%55.98%29.92%7.40%
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF
10.67%17.04%30.19%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKL.TO and HUBL.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNKL.TO
BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBL.TO
HUBL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HUBL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF (HUBL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNKL.TOHUBL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.95

1.23

+0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.48

1.50

+6.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.55

4.47

+31.08

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.54, which is higher than the HUBL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKL.TO and HUBL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum HUBL.TO drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and HUBL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKL.TOHUBL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-51.30%

+32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-16.47%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-25.70%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-2.23%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.95%

-15.97%

+13.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

5.52%

-2.95%

Volatility

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF (HUBL.TO) at 4.95%. This indicates that BNKL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKL.TOHUBL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

4.95%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

15.08%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

19.73%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

24.81%

-8.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

28.88%

-12.94%

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKL.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HUBL.TO's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKL.TO vs. HUBL.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than HUBL.TO's 7.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
2.64%3.40%4.39%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUBL.TO
Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF
7.89%8.32%7.78%8.87%7.40%5.83%7.13%5.84%6.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNKL.TO and HUBL.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUBL.TO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUBL.TO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BNKL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for BNKL.TO and 0.99% for HUBL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKL.TO and HUBL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer