BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BNKL.TO (Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and HCA.TO (Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKL.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while HCA.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKL.TO returned 75.00% vs 61.56% for HCA.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BNKL.TO charges 1.33%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HCA.TO.

Performance

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than HCA.TO's 19.58% return.

BNKL.TO

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 20.92%
• 6M: 28.82%
• 1Y: 75.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HCA.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.81%
• YTD: 19.58%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 61.56%
• 3Y*: 43.51%
• 5Y*: 28.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	20.92%	55.98%	29.92%	9.73%
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF	19.58%	51.09%	33.32%	16.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKL.TO and HCA.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2023	0.61

The correlation between BNKL.TO and HCA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKL.TO

BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

HCA.TO

HCA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 96
HCA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HCA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HCA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HCA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HCA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKL.TO	HCA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.00	4.82	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.67	7.08	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.97	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.02	7.27	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.53	32.98	-2.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.00, which is comparable to the HCA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKL.TO and HCA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKL.TO	HCA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.00	4.82	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.60	2.18	+0.42

Drawdowns

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, roughly equal to the maximum HCA.TO drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and HCA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKL.TO	HCA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.58%	-17.82%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-8.52%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.44%	-1.28%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-3.35%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	1.87%	+0.60%

Volatility

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF (HCA.TO) at 4.15%. This indicates that BNKL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKL.TO	HCA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	4.15%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	11.14%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.15%	12.85%	+2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	15.09%	+0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	15.09%	+0.74%

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKL.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HCA.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKL.TO vs. HCA.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than HCA.TO's 2.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF	2.99%	3.40%	4.39%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HCA.TO Hamilton Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index ETF	2.92%	5.59%	15.89%	20.26%	16.23%	11.79%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKL.TO and HCA.TO in my portfolio?

BNKL.TO and HCA.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BNKL.TO or HCA.TO?

On fees, HCA.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKL.TO or HCA.TO?

HCA.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for BNKL.TO.

What is the main difference between BNKL.TO and HCA.TO?

BNKL.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HCA.TO is Canada Equities. BNKL.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while HCA.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Bank Mean Reversion Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for BNKL.TO and 0.45% for HCA.TO.