PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKE.L vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNKE.L is traded in GBP, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKE.L achieves a 4.63% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.86% return.


BNKE.L

1D
0.77%
1M
6.68%
YTD
4.63%
6M
11.03%
1Y
45.15%
3Y*
46.04%
5Y*
29.25%
10Y*

IB01.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.20%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.05%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
2.10%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BNKE.L
Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
4.63%99.94%25.19%27.75%6.62%31.33%-18.12%2.40%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.86%-3.10%7.09%-0.32%13.10%0.95%-2.08%-5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKE.L and IB01.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKE.L
BNKE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKE.LIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

0.96

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

2.62

+6.10

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKE.L and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKE.LIB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

0.75

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.53

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.26

+0.48

Drawdowns

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKE.L drawdown since its inception was -48.52%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -19.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKE.L and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKE.LIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.52%

-19.26%

-29.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.66%

-5.16%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.40%

-9.81%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.21%

-15.94%

-18.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-6.05%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-9.35%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

1.90%

+3.27%

Volatility

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor EURO STOXX Banks (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (BNKE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 1.80%. This indicates that BNKE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNKE.LIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

1.80%

+4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

4.96%

+13.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

6.60%

+16.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

8.47%

+16.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.62%

8.81%

+20.81%

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKE.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNKE.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKE.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BNKE.L and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for BNKE.L.

BNKE.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. BNKE.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for BNKE.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNKE.L and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer