PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNIVX vs. GSIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrow Hanley International Value Fund (BNIVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNIVX achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly higher than GSIHX's 7.94% return.


BNIVX

1D
2.91%
1M
-0.13%
6M
11.49%
YTD
20.34%
1Y
29.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.34%

GSIHX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.03%
6M
4.24%
YTD
7.94%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BNIVX and GSIHX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNIVX vs. GSIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNIVX
BNIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BNIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BNIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIHX
GSIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GSIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrow Hanley International Value Fund (BNIVX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNIVXGSIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.96

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.61

5.27

+5.33

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GSIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNIVX and GSIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNIVX drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum GSIHX drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNIVX and GSIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNIVXGSIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-28.79%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.94%

-7.83%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.37%

-2.31%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-4.94%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.90%

+0.17%

Volatility

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Volatility Comparison

Barrow Hanley International Value Fund (BNIVX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) at 2.72%. This indicates that BNIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNIVXGSIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

2.72%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

8.17%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.50%

9.86%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.37%

14.28%

+3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

15.63%

+1.74%

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNIVX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIHX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNIVX vs. GSIHX - Dividend Comparison

BNIVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BNIVX
Barrow Hanley International Value Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSIHX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A
4.45%4.80%10.87%2.04%4.47%1.90%0.00%0.41%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNIVX and GSIHX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNIVX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GSIHX (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNIVX dropped -10.94% vs GSIHX's -28.79%.

BNIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNIVX and GSIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer