PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNGO vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BNGO vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNGO achieves a -15.03% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 12.75% return.


BNGO

1D
3.17%
1M
4.84%
YTD
-15.03%
6M
-24.86%
1Y
-64.77%
3Y*
-86.03%
5Y*
-80.06%
10Y*

NIO

1D
-4.33%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
12.75%
6M
20.04%
1Y
62.89%
3Y*
-8.72%
5Y*
-32.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNGO vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BNGO
Bionano Genomics, Inc.
-15.03%-91.16%-84.74%-87.05%-51.17%-2.92%148.39%-76.34%-25.04%
NIO
NIO Inc.
12.75%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-35.00%1,112.44%-36.89%-25.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BNGO and NIO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between BNGO and NIO has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BNGO:

-$6.55

NIO:

-$3.74

PS Ratio

BNGO:

0.21

NIO:

0.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNGO:

$22.06M

NIO:

$100.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNGO:

$3.32M

NIO:

$15.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

BNGO:

-$23.09M

NIO:

-$7.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNGO vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNGO
BNGO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNGO vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNGONIODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.80

1.00

-1.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.09

1.77

-2.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.20

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

1.45

-2.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.08

2.60

-3.68

BNGO vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNGO and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNGONIODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

1.00

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.89

-0.46

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

-0.02

-0.32

Drawdowns

BNGO vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNGO drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than NIO's maximum drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNGO and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNGONIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-95.00%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.85%

-43.73%

-34.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.76%

-79.69%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.98%

-94.10%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-90.85%

-9.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.70%

-67.85%

-15.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.12%

24.25%

+35.87%

Volatility

BNGO vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bionano Genomics, Inc. (BNGO) is 11.64%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 18.85%. This indicates that BNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNGONIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.64%

18.85%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.02%

41.10%

+3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.10%

62.97%

+18.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.54%

71.68%

+18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.66%

86.72%

+104.94%

Dividends

BNGO vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNGO nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BNGO vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bionano Genomics, Inc. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
6.69K
25.53B
(BNGO) Total Revenue
(NIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BNGO and NIO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIO has higher volatility (18.85%) compared to BNGO (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNGO dropped -99.99% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNGO and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer