BNDY vs. IBTM
BNDY (Horizon Core Bond ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. BNDY is actively managed, while IBTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BNDY charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
BNDY vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDY achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.50% return.
BNDY
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDY vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF | 0.87% | 5.34% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.50% | 3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDY and IBTM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDY vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
BNDY
IBTM
BNDY vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDY | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 0.20 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
BNDY vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDY drawdown since its inception was -3.93%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDY and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDY | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -13.60% | +9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -2.38% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -4.82% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
BNDY vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDY | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01% | 4.09% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 7.56% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 7.56% | -2.55% |
BNDY vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDY vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
BNDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDY Horizon Core Bond ETF | 4.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDY and IBTM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for BNDY.
BNDY has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.95% for IBTM.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for BNDY and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for BNDY and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer