PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has outperformed VGLT with an annualized return of 1.72%, while VGLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.21% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.72%

VGLT

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.30%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-1.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDX vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.02%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.03%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and VGLT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.70

The correlation between BNDX and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDX vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

1.19

+0.65

BNDX vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-46.18%

+29.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-7.01%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-17.68%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-40.98%

+25.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-46.18%

+29.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-36.55%

+35.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-15.09%

+11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.78%

-1.73%

Volatility

BNDX vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.49%, while Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

2.69%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

6.09%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

8.78%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

14.57%

-9.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

13.82%

-9.72%

BNDX vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDX vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than VGLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.59%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and VGLT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGLT has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to BNDX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

On 10-year performance, BNDX leads with 1.72% vs -1.21% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNDX has performed better with a 1.72% return vs -1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BNDX.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.47% for BNDX.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while VGLT is Government Bonds. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.03% for VGLT.

BNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer