PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 1.74%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.01%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.40%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
1.74%

SCHB

1D
1.08%
1M
1.29%
YTD
10.75%
6M
10.75%
1Y
27.45%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
15.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDX vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.21%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
10.75%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and SCHB is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.02

Over the past year, BNDX and SCHB have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDX vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.39

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

3.06

-2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

13.65

-11.52

BNDX vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-35.27%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-8.91%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-19.34%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-25.41%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-35.27%

+19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-1.19%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-4.11%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.00%

-0.94%

Volatility

BNDX vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.13%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

4.91%

-3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

10.07%

-7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

12.74%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

17.34%

-12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

18.36%

-14.27%

BNDX vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDX vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.46%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and SCHB have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to BNDX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.06% vs 1.74% for BNDX. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.06% return vs 1.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BNDX.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer