PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than PONAX's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed PONAX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while PONAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.22% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.58%
1M
1.01%
YTD
0.85%
6M
0.99%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*
1.69%

PONAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.83%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.85%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.18%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and PONAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, BNDX and PONAX have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXPONAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.33

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.93

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

6.45

-4.54

BNDX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and PONAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-13.64%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-3.69%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-3.90%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-13.64%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-13.64%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-1.67%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-1.79%

-1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.10%

-0.05%

Volatility

BNDX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.50%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.62%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

3.30%

-0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

4.10%

-0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

4.82%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

4.22%

-0.12%

BNDX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than PONAX's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.48%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.46%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and PONAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PONAX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to BNDX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

PONAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and PONAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer