BNDX vs. NXUS
BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) and NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - BNDX tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged) while NXUS tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BNDX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NXUS.
Performance
BNDX vs. NXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BNDX at 1.21% and NXUS at 1.21%.
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 2.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
NXUS
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX vs. NXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 1.21% | 0.46% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.21% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDX and NXUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDX vs. NXUS — Risk / Return Rank
BNDX
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNDX vs. NXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDX | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDX vs. NXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, which is greater than NXUS's maximum drawdown of -2.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and NXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDX | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -2.81% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.61% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -0.91% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility
BNDX vs. NXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDX | NXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45% | 3.74% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 3.74% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 3.74% | +0.35% |
BNDX vs. NXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NXUS's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDX vs. NXUS - Dividend Comparison
BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than NXUS's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.66% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDX and NXUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for NXUS.
BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 1.66% for NXUS.
BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged), while NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.08% for NXUS.
Find the right allocation for BNDX and NXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer