BNDX vs. JPIB
BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) and JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. BNDX is passively managed, while JPIB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNDX returned 0.35%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for JPIB. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for JPIB.
Performance
BNDX vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than JPIB's 0.80% return.
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 1.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
JPIB
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDX vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.64% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.00% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 0.80% | 8.19% | 3.48% | 8.68% | -6.38% | 0.14% | 7.14% | 10.76% | -2.17% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDX and JPIB is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2017 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, BNDX and JPIB have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
BNDX vs. JPIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNDX
JPIB
Real Estate
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
BNDX
JPIB
Financial Services
BNDX
JPIB
Industrials
BNDX
JPIB
Energy
BNDX
JPIB
Utilities
BNDX
JPIB
Communication Services
BNDX
JPIB
Healthcare
BNDX
JPIB
Basic Materials
BNDX
-
JPIB
Consumer Cyclical
BNDX
-
JPIB
Consumer Defensive
BNDX
-
JPIB
Technology
BNDX
-
JPIB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDX vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank
BNDX
JPIB
BNDX vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNDX | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.27 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.82 | 4.43 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDX | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.36 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.69 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.82 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
BNDX vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, which is greater than JPIB's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and JPIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDX | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -13.13% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -3.75% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.93% | -3.75% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.86% | -11.83% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -1.06% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -1.93% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 1.08% | -0.05% |
Volatility
BNDX vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.57% compared to JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) at 1.07%. This indicates that BNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDX | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.57% | 1.07% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 3.00% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 3.53% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 4.11% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 4.44% | -0.35% |
BNDX vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDX vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison
BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than JPIB's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 5.02% | 4.85% | 4.57% | 4.35% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 3.14% | 4.66% | 5.83% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDX and JPIB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNDX has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to JPIB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs JPIB's -13.13%.
On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.84% vs 0.35% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, JPIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.84% return vs 0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 4.49% for BNDX.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNDX and JPIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer