PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BNDX has underperformed DBE with an annualized return of 1.52%, while DBE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


BNDX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.52%
ALL TIME*
2.28%

DBE

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.98%
6M
57.84%
YTD
71.26%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.29M$189.02M$229.54M
$1.27M$1.08M$1.67M

BNDX vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.62%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
71.26%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and DBE is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

-0.16

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BNDX and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.16 to -0.55, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNDX vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.28

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.50

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

7.82

-6.74

BNDX vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-86.69%

+70.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-24.72%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-24.72%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-38.74%

+22.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-60.84%

+44.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-34.98%

+33.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-57.13%

+54.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

7.90%

-6.75%

Volatility

BNDX vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) is 1.17%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that BNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

15.07%

-13.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

34.26%

-31.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

37.66%

-34.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

30.15%

-25.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

28.60%

-24.51%

BNDX vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDX vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than DBE's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.55%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.26%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and DBE have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to BNDX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 10-year performance, DBE leads with 12.24% vs 1.52% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBE has performed better with a 12.24% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.26% for DBE.

BNDX is categorized as Global Bonds, while DBE is Oil & Gas. BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (Hedged), while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BNDX and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer