BNDP vs. VTV
BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BNDP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
BNDP vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.37% return.
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 27.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $504.98K | $475.70K | $762.42K | |
| $688.19M | $688.42M | $619.05M |
BNDP vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | -0.46% | 0.08% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.37% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDP and VTV is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDP vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
BNDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTV
BNDP vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNDP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNDP vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -59.27% | +56.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.36% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -7.82% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
BNDP vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDP | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 10.36% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 13.82% | -10.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.65% | 16.61% | -12.96% |
BNDP vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BNDP vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.47% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDP and VTV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for BNDP.
BNDP has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.
BNDP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. BNDP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Float Adjusted Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.04% for VTV.
Find the right allocation for BNDP and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer