PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDI vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDI vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDI achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -20.70% return.


BNDI

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.59%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
10Y*

BTCI

1D
-5.71%
1M
-12.46%
YTD
-20.70%
6M
-22.95%
1Y
-30.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDI vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
1.51%7.95%-1.46%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-20.70%-1.09%28.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDI and BTCI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDI vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDI
BNDI Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDI Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDI vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDIBTCIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

-0.79

+2.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

-1.01

+3.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.88

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

-0.68

+3.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.27

-1.23

+10.50

BNDI vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDI and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDIBTCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

-0.79

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.01

+0.65

Drawdowns

BNDI vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDI drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDI and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDIBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-44.98%

+38.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-44.98%

+42.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-41.37%

+40.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-15.11%

+13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

24.90%

-24.13%

Volatility

BNDI vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF (BNDI) is 1.41%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that BNDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDIBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

8.56%

-7.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

31.26%

-28.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

38.85%

-34.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

40.11%

-33.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

40.11%

-33.92%

BNDI vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDI has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDI vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

BNDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than BTCI's 42.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNDI
Neos Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF
5.79%5.69%5.54%5.17%1.68%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
42.05%36.46%6.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDI and BTCI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to BNDI (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDI dropped -6.98% vs BTCI's -44.98%.

On 1-year performance, BNDI leads with 7.31% vs -30.68% for BTCI. On fees, BNDI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BNDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BNDI has performed better with a 7.31% return vs -30.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 42.05%, compared with 5.79% for BNDI.

BNDI is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BNDI and 0.99% for BTCI.

BNDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDI and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer