PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDC vs. IBTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNDC vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNDC vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
0.10%7.29%0.86%5.36%-2.71%
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
-0.01%8.06%-0.14%3.48%-4.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.01% return.


BNDC

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

IBTM

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
2.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNDC vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNDC vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDC
BNDC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDC vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDCIBTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

0.88

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.57

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

4.42

+0.68

BNDC vs. IBTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the IBTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDC and IBTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDCIBTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.88

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.22

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BNDC and IBTM is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BNDC vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison

BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than IBTM's 3.91% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BNDC
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund
4.27%4.16%3.81%3.19%2.64%1.72%2.61%2.89%2.86%2.50%0.64%
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.91%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BNDC vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, which is greater than IBTM's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and IBTM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDCIBTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.80%

-13.60%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-2.85%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-1.91%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-4.95%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.01%

-0.09%

Volatility

BNDC vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) have volatilities of 1.53% and 1.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNDCIBTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.54%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.72%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62%

4.77%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.06%

7.69%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.11%

7.69%

+0.42%