BNDC vs. HYGV
BNDC (FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund) and HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BNDC is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Northern Trust, while HYGV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. BNDC is actively managed, while HYGV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNDC returned -0.19%/yr vs 3.52%/yr for HYGV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNDC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for HYGV.
Performance
BNDC vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNDC achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than HYGV's 1.56% return.
BNDC
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- -0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
HYGV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDC vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund | 0.07% | 7.29% | 0.86% | 5.36% | -13.54% | -2.01% | 8.66% | 9.57% | 0.86% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.56% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNDC and HYGV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BNDC and HYGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BNDC vs. HYGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNDC
HYGV
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BNDC
HYGV
-
Basic Materials
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Communication Services
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Consumer Defensive
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Energy
BNDC
-
HYGV
Healthcare
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Industrials
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Real Estate
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Technology
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Utilities
BNDC
-
HYGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNDC vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank
BNDC
HYGV
BNDC vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNDC | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.57 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 11.11 | -6.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNDC | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.80 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.47 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.55 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
BNDC vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNDC drawdown since its inception was -18.80%, smaller than the maximum HYGV drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDC and HYGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNDC | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.80% | -23.47% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.68% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.30% | -5.56% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.60% | -17.12% | -1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.13% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -3.32% | -4.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.62% | +0.35% |
Volatility
BNDC vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund (BNDC) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNDC | HYGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.18% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.78% | 3.01% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 3.85% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 7.59% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.05% | 9.20% | -1.15% |
BNDC vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNDC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNDC vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison
BNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than HYGV's 7.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDC FlexShares Core Select Bond Fund | 4.15% | 4.16% | 3.81% | 3.19% | 2.64% | 1.72% | 2.61% | 2.89% | 2.86% | 2.50% | 0.64% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.40% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNDC and HYGV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNDC has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to HYGV (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDC dropped -18.80% vs HYGV's -23.47%.
On 5-year performance, HYGV leads with 3.52% vs -0.19% for BNDC. On fees, BNDC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYGV has performed better with a 3.52% return vs -0.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 4.15% for BNDC.
BNDC is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BNDC and 0.37% for HYGV.
HYGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNDC and HYGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer