PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 1.57%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.73% annualized return.


BND

1D
0.08%
1M
1.11%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.87%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.57%

SPYM

1D
1.76%
1M
2.12%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.52%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
15.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.60%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.01%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and SPYM is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

-0.11

The correlation between BND and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.16

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

14.26

-8.97

BND vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BND vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-54.46%

+35.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-8.90%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-18.72%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-24.48%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

-33.87%

+15.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-0.63%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-7.14%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.97%

-1.05%

Volatility

BND vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.28%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

4.61%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

9.72%

-6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

12.33%

-8.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

16.89%

-10.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

18.04%

-12.51%

BND vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BND vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than SPYM's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.95%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.27%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND and SPYM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.73% vs 1.57% for BND. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.73% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for BND.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 1.27% for SPYM.

BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SPYM is S&P 500. BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer