BND vs. CRM

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) is Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BND returned 1.43%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for CRM. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

BND vs. CRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than CRM's -34.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed CRM with an annualized return of 1.43%, while CRM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.

BND

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: -0.09%
• YTD: 0.08%
• 1Y: 3.77%
• 3Y*: 3.82%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: 1.43%
• ALL TIME*: 3.03%

CRM

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: 14.50%
• 6M: -23.09%
• YTD: -34.06%
• 1Y: -33.20%
• 3Y*: -8.14%
• 5Y*: -6.09%
• 10Y*: 7.91%
• ALL TIME*: 19.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. CRM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	0.08%	7.08%	1.38%	5.65%	-13.11%	-1.86%	7.71%	8.84%	-0.12%	3.57%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	-34.06%	-20.25%	27.76%	98.46%	-47.83%	14.20%	36.82%	18.74%	33.98%	49.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and CRM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007	-0.10

The correlation between BND and CRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BND vs. CRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 35
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CRM

CRM Risk / Return Rank: 11
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. CRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BND	CRM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	-0.85	+1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	-1.13	+2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.87	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	-0.76	+2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	-1.41	+5.22

BND vs. CRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the CRM Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and CRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BND vs. CRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum CRM drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and CRM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BND	CRM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.58%	-70.50%	+51.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.68%	-43.98%	+41.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.59%	-58.67%	+53.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.91%	-58.67%	+40.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.58%	-58.67%	+40.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.55%	-52.15%	+49.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-16.32%	+13.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	23.57%	-22.58%

Volatility

BND vs. CRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.08%, while Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BND	CRM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	10.92%	-9.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.87%	32.26%	-29.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.72%	39.41%	-35.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.03%	37.42%	-31.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.53%	35.52%	-29.99%

Dividends

BND vs. CRM - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than CRM's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	4.00%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%
CRM Salesforce, Inc.	0.99%	0.63%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BND and CRM in my portfolio?

BND and CRM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BND or CRM?

CRM has higher volatility (10.92%) compared to BND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs CRM's -70.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.