BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO
BND.TO (Purpose Global Bond Fund) and ZUAG.TO (BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both Global Bonds funds. BND.TO is actively managed, while ZUAG.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BND.TO returned 7.48%/yr vs 4.35%/yr for ZUAG.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BND.TO achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than ZUAG.TO's 3.68% return.
BND.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
ZUAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 1.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund | 1.55% | 7.26% | 7.49% | 4.29% |
ZUAG.TO BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.68% | -3.77% | 9.45% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND.TO and ZUAG.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2023 | 0.23 |
The correlation between BND.TO and ZUAG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BND.TO
ZUAG.TO
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZUAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BND.TO | ZUAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.04 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 0.12 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 0.20 | +8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, which is greater than ZUAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND.TO and ZUAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND.TO | ZUAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.55% | -9.71% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -9.71% | +6.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | -9.71% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -5.62% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -3.38% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 5.94% | -5.24% |
Volatility
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) is 1.22%, while BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZUAG.TO) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND.TO | ZUAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 1.31% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 7.36% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14% | 8.84% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 8.26% | -3.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 8.26% | -3.11% |
Dividends
BND.TO vs. ZUAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
BND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than ZUAG.TO's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund | 5.82% | 5.70% | 5.24% | 5.20% | 4.14% | 3.67% | 3.48% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.47% | 3.26% | 0.53% |
ZUAG.TO BMO US Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 2.66% | 2.58% | 2.09% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BND.TO and ZUAG.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BND.TO and ZUAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer