BN.TO vs. CASH.TO
BN.TO (Brookfield Corporation) is a stock, while CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) is Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past 3 years, BN.TO returned 30.76%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN.TO achieves a -3.13% return, which is significantly lower than CASH.TO's 0.83% return.
BN.TO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- -3.13%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 30.76%
- 5Y*
- 14.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | -3.13% | 15.10% | 56.51% | 26.33% | -29.85% | 1.91% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.83% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.39% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BN.TO and CASH.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BN.TO
CASH.TO
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BN.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -31.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 7.47 | -6.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 111.49 | -110.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 468.24 | -466.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BN.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 10.33 | -9.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 5.52 | -5.08 |
Drawdowns
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.06% | -0.80% | -82.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | -0.02% | -22.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.93% | -0.06% | -28.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.09% | 0.00% | -10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -0.00% | -20.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 0.00% | +7.90% |
Volatility
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that BN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BN.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 0.06% | +9.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.64% | 0.13% | +21.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.20% | 0.22% | +27.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.91% | 0.61% | +28.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 0.61% | +27.59% |
Dividends
BN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
BN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.99% | 2.06% | 1.06% | 1.52% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.43% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BN.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BN.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer