BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO).
Performance
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | -13.08% | -4.84% | 51.69% | 42.59% | -12.88% |
RCI-B.TO Rogers Communications Inc | 4.21% | 22.76% | -26.08% | 1.25% | 1.58% |
Fundamentals
BAM.TO:
CA$2.29
RCI-B.TO:
CA$19.26
BAM.TO:
27.01
RCI-B.TO:
2.78
BAM.TO:
0.05
RCI-B.TO:
0.03
BAM.TO:
13.70
RCI-B.TO:
0.89
BAM.TO:
CA$4.90B
RCI-B.TO:
CA$21.71B
BAM.TO:
CA$4.64B
RCI-B.TO:
CA$5.02B
BAM.TO:
CA$2.89B
RCI-B.TO:
CA$14.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than RCI-B.TO's 4.21% return.
BAM.TO
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -13.08%
- 6M
- -20.43%
- 1Y
- -8.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCI-B.TO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 4.21%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 45.29%
- 3Y*
- -1.32%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BAM.TO
RCI-B.TO
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAM.TO | RCI-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 2.08 | -2.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | 2.85 | -2.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.37 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 3.00 | -3.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 8.14 | -8.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAM.TO | RCI-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 2.08 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.24 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAM.TO and RCI-B.TO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Dividend Comparison
BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than RCI-B.TO's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAM.TO Brookfield Asset Management Ltd | 4.05% | 3.41% | 2.67% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RCI-B.TO Rogers Communications Inc | 3.74% | 3.86% | 4.53% | 3.22% | 3.16% | 3.32% | 5.06% | 3.10% | 2.74% | 3.00% | 3.71% | 4.02% |
Drawdowns
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.79%, smaller than the maximum RCI-B.TO drawdown of -82.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and RCI-B.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAM.TO | RCI-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -82.47% | +51.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.31% | -10.89% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.15% | -18.21% | -8.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -25.00% | +16.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | 5.28% | +8.07% |
Volatility
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Rogers Communications Inc (RCI-B.TO) at 5.18%. This indicates that BAM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCI-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAM.TO | RCI-B.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 5.18% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.14% | 14.46% | +7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.35% | 21.98% | +10.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 19.47% | +10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 21.05% | +8.98% |
Financials
BAM.TO vs. RCI-B.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and Rogers Communications Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities