BMVP vs. VFMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).
BMVP and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BMVP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MVP Index. It was launched on May 1, 2003. VFMV is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
BMVP vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMVP vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 2.87% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -9.26% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.90% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BMVP having a 2.87% return and VFMV slightly higher at 2.90%.
BMVP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMVP vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMVP vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
BMVP
VFMV
BMVP vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMVP | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 3.69 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMVP | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.80 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.66 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMVP and VFMV is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BMVP vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BMVP vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and VFMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMVP | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -33.64% | -44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.26% | -9.63% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -15.41% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.11% | -4.26% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.46% | -3.69% | -32.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.09% | +0.38% |
Volatility
BMVP vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 3.09%, while Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMVP | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.43% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.37% | 6.62% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.24% | 12.28% | +1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 11.77% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 14.34% | +4.50% |