PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMVP vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 66.14% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 10.04%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.


BMVP

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
5.43%
6M
4.09%
1Y
9.58%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*
10.04%

UGA

1D
4.14%
1M
-5.40%
YTD
66.14%
6M
62.36%
1Y
70.24%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
23.21%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
5.43%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
66.14%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and UGA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008

0.26

The correlation between BMVP and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMVPUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

3.47

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

10.69

-6.24

BMVP vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-86.59%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-20.32%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-26.68%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-38.11%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-75.89%

+36.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-17.02%

+14.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.11%

-36.69%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

6.59%

-4.43%

Volatility

BMVP vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 2.52%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMVPUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

8.84%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

30.92%

-23.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.81%

34.74%

-24.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

34.52%

-18.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

37.24%

-18.46%

BMVP vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMVP vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.80%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMVP and UGA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to BMVP (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.74% vs 10.04% for BMVP. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

BMVP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMVP and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer