BMVP vs. RWJ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ).

BMVP and RWJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BMVP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MVP Index. It was launched on May 1, 2003. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both BMVP and RWJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BMVP vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	2.87%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	4.08%	7.75%	11.81%	16.21%	-10.97%	52.82%	20.83%	20.29%	-16.95%	5.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 4.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 9.18%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.

BMVP

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 6.74%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: 9.18%

RWJ

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -3.36%
• YTD: 4.08%
• 6M: 4.51%
• 1Y: 25.44%
• 3Y*: 11.97%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 12.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.

RWJ

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF

BMVP

Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF

Return for Risk

BMVP vs. RWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 26
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 30

RWJ

RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 56
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.01	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	1.56	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.21	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	1.59	-1.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	5.68	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the RWJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and RWJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	1.01	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.29	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.47	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.44	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and RWJ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BMVP vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than RWJ's 1.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.73%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	1.13%	1.11%	1.15%	1.34%	1.02%	0.61%	0.89%	1.22%	1.44%	1.11%	0.60%	0.74%

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and RWJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-55.97%	-22.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.26%	-16.11%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-29.29%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	-51.33%	+11.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.11%	-7.38%	+2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.46%	-9.31%	-27.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	4.52%	-2.05%

Volatility

BMVP vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 3.09%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	6.11%	-3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.37%	13.97%	-6.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	25.39%	-11.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	23.88%	-7.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	26.16%	-7.32%