BMVP vs. RWJ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMVP (Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF) and RWJ (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMVP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg MVP Index, while RWJ is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BMVP returned 9.43%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for RWJ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMVP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWJ.

Performance

BMVP vs. RWJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than RWJ's 17.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has underperformed RWJ with an annualized return of 9.43%, while RWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.

BMVP

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 10.03%
• 3Y*: 14.03%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 9.43%

RWJ

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 17.38%
• 6M: 16.77%
• 1Y: 39.12%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 13.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMVP vs. RWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	6.62%	6.15%	17.46%	19.03%	-16.01%	19.38%	8.52%	13.47%	-6.40%	20.16%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	17.38%	7.75%	11.81%	16.21%	-10.97%	52.82%	20.83%	20.29%	-16.95%	5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and RWJ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008	0.77

The correlation between BMVP and RWJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BMVP	RWJ
Industrials	16.8%	16.2%
Financial Services	16.4%	11.0%
Technology	16.4%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	23.9%
Healthcare	9.7%	11.2%
Communication Services	7.6%	3.3%
Real Estate	5.5%	4.0%
Energy	5.2%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	6.9%
Utilities	5.1%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	5.2%

Return for Risk

BMVP vs. RWJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP

BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 30
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 33

RWJ

RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 63
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	2.03	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.91	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	3.48	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.78	11.12	-6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMVP vs. RWJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the RWJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and RWJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	2.03	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.34	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.50	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.46	-0.35

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. RWJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than RWJ's maximum drawdown of -55.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and RWJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-55.97%	-22.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-11.31%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-29.29%	+14.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	-29.29%	+2.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	-51.33%	+11.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	0.00%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-9.24%	-26.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	3.53%	-1.43%

Volatility

BMVP vs. RWJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) is 2.26%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that BMVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMVP	RWJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	4.66%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	12.35%	-5.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.77%	19.40%	-9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	23.72%	-7.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	26.14%	-7.33%

BMVP vs. RWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RWJ's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMVP vs. RWJ - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than RWJ's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF	1.67%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF	1.00%	1.11%	1.15%	1.34%	1.02%	0.61%	0.89%	1.22%	1.44%	1.11%	0.60%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMVP and RWJ in my portfolio?

BMVP and RWJ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMVP or RWJ?

RWJ has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to BMVP (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMVP dropped -78.13% vs RWJ's -55.97%.

Which ETF is better, BMVP or RWJ?

On 10-year performance, RWJ leads with 13.01% vs 9.43% for BMVP. On fees, BMVP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, BMVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BMVP or RWJ?

Over the 10-year period, RWJ has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMVP or RWJ?

BMVP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMVP or RWJ?

BMVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.00% for RWJ.

What is the main difference between BMVP and RWJ?

BMVP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RWJ is Small Cap Value Equities. BMVP tracks Bloomberg MVP Index, while RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BMVP and 0.39% for RWJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.