PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMVP vs. FTDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMVP vs. FTDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMVP vs. FTDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
2.60%6.15%17.46%19.03%-16.01%19.38%8.52%13.47%-6.40%20.16%
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
7.34%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMVP achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTDS's 7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BMVP has underperformed FTDS with an annualized return of 9.15%, while FTDS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


BMVP

1D
1.17%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.60%
6M
2.73%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
9.15%

FTDS

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
7.34%
6M
9.57%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMVP vs. FTDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMVP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FTDS's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMVP vs. FTDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMVP
BMVP Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BMVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMVP Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BMVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMVP vs. FTDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMVPFTDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

1.15

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

1.74

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.66

-0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.23

7.46

-4.23

BMVP vs. FTDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMVP Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FTDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMVP and FTDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMVPFTDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.15

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.32

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BMVP and FTDS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BMVP vs. FTDS - Dividend Comparison

BMVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than FTDS's 1.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF
1.73%1.77%1.58%1.67%1.51%0.56%1.09%0.95%1.44%1.75%1.35%1.02%
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.64%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Drawdowns

BMVP vs. FTDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMVP drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than FTDS's maximum drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMVP and FTDS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMVPFTDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.13%

-56.53%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.98%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-23.35%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.45%

-42.47%

+3.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

-3.74%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.46%

-9.92%

-26.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

2.89%

-0.44%

Volatility

BMVP vs. FTDS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) have volatilities of 3.07% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMVPFTDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.94%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

9.68%

-2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

17.99%

-3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.65%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

20.14%

-1.30%