BMSIX vs. ECAT
BMSIX (BlackRock Income Fund) and ECAT (BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust) are both mutual funds - BMSIX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while ECAT is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 3 years, BMSIX returned 7.03%/yr vs 19.24%/yr for ECAT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMSIX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ECAT.
Performance
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMSIX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than ECAT's 11.23% return.
BMSIX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 6.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.84%
ECAT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMSIX BlackRock Income Fund | 0.57% | 8.38% | 5.96% | 7.84% | -10.08% | -1.37% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 11.23% | 16.64% | 19.96% | 32.36% | -21.90% | -6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMSIX and ECAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMSIX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank
BMSIX
ECAT
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Fund (BMSIX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMSIX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.28 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.77 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 6.65 | +3.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMSIX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.56 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.55 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMSIX drawdown since its inception was -18.60%, smaller than the maximum ECAT drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMSIX and ECAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMSIX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -32.23% | +13.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.51% | -11.80% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.58% | -15.79% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.20% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -9.11% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 3.14% | -2.55% |
Volatility
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Income Fund (BMSIX) is 1.01%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that BMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMSIX | ECAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 3.31% | -2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 10.59% | -8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 13.44% | -10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 16.90% | -13.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 16.90% | -12.75% |
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMSIX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMSIX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison
BMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than ECAT's 21.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMSIX BlackRock Income Fund | 5.63% | 5.66% | 5.99% | 4.38% | 3.71% | 5.31% | 4.19% | 4.90% | 5.13% | 4.03% | 4.49% | 4.35% |
ECAT BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust | 21.71% | 23.00% | 17.44% | 9.14% | 8.94% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMSIX and ECAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ECAT has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to BMSIX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMSIX dropped -18.60% vs ECAT's -32.23%.
BMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMSIX and ECAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer