PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMPIX vs. ULPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMPIX achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly higher than ULPIX's 16.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BMPIX has underperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 10.91%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.21% annualized return.


BMPIX

1D
0.02%
1M
4.12%
YTD
19.90%
6M
18.12%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
10.91%

ULPIX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
16.02%
6M
13.77%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
32.87%
5Y*
17.45%
10Y*
23.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
19.90%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
16.02%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BMPIX and ULPIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between BMPIX and ULPIX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMPIX vs. ULPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMPIXULPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.67

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

11.36

-7.14

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the ULPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMPIX and ULPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, smaller than the maximum ULPIX drawdown of -89.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMPIX and ULPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMPIXULPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-89.68%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-18.30%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-36.59%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-46.92%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-59.41%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.20%

-3.93%

-2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.08%

-33.78%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.65%

4.29%

+2.36%

Volatility

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) have volatilities of 9.01% and 9.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMPIXULPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

9.35%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

19.65%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.22%

24.96%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.65%

34.09%

-4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.18%

35.54%

-3.36%

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMPIX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMPIX vs. ULPIX - Dividend Comparison

BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than ULPIX's 7.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.51%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
7.85%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMPIX and ULPIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ULPIX has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to BMPIX (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMPIX dropped -84.22% vs ULPIX's -89.68%.

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMPIX and ULPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer