PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMPIX vs. UGPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMPIX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -25.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BMPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.12% annualized return.


BMPIX

1D
1.71%
1M
2.12%
YTD
19.15%
6M
23.02%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.29%

UGPIX

1D
4.53%
1M
-6.19%
YTD
-25.02%
6M
-28.64%
1Y
-11.24%
3Y*
-5.13%
5Y*
-34.94%
10Y*
-13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
19.15%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
-25.02%36.28%-21.79%-11.49%-53.03%-73.86%76.47%40.07%-46.51%105.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BMPIX and UGPIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.28

The correlation between BMPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

UGPIX
UGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
UGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMPIXUGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.01

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

-0.19

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

-0.34

+4.38

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the UGPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMPIX and UGPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMPIXUGPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

-0.19

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

-0.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

-0.05

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.05

+0.22

Drawdowns

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMPIX and UGPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMPIXUGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.22%

-99.66%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.38%

-52.67%

+34.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.54%

-53.13%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-98.24%

+59.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-99.10%

+37.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-97.87%

+91.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-82.71%

+58.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

28.73%

-22.28%

Volatility

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) is 8.89%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that BMPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMPIXUGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

18.51%

-9.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.25%

36.57%

-17.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.13%

52.09%

-26.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

390.11%

-360.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

277.98%

-245.88%

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMPIX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison

BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than UGPIX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.52%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
UGPIX
ProFunds UltraChina
8.06%6.05%2.91%3.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.77%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGPIX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to BMPIX (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMPIX dropped -84.22% vs UGPIX's -99.66%.

BMPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMPIX and UGPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer