BMPIX vs. UGPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX).
BMPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 3, 2001. UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008.
Performance
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 11.87% | 9.09% | -5.35% | 15.30% | -16.22% | 38.93% | 18.27% | 25.13% | -26.81% | 34.96% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -27.95% | 36.28% | -21.79% | -11.49% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMPIX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BMPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.29% annualized return.
BMPIX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -11.85%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -48.28%
- 1Y
- -30.96%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -14.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMPIX has a 1.89% expense ratio, which is higher than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
BMPIX
UGPIX
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | -0.55 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | -0.51 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.69 | +1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | -1.49 | +4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | -0.55 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | -0.10 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | -0.05 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | -0.05 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMPIX and UGPIX is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
BMPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than UGPIX's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMPIX ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund | 1.62% | 1.81% | 0.94% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.39% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.22%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMPIX and UGPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -99.66% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -51.12% | +29.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | -98.52% | +60.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.41% | -99.10% | +37.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.48% | -97.95% | +85.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -82.60% | +58.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 23.70% | -17.10% |
Volatility
BMPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) is 8.81%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 15.79%. This indicates that BMPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.81% | 15.79% | -6.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.58% | 36.85% | -18.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.56% | 57.63% | -26.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 390.11% | -360.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 277.87% | -245.81% |