BMOP vs. TPYP
BMOP (BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BMOP is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. BMOP is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BMOP charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
BMOP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BMOP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPYP
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- YTD
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 22.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
BMOP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | 2.55% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMOP and TPYP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMOP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
BMOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPYP
BMOP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMOP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMOP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMOP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -51.91% | +49.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -5.39% | +5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -7.87% | +7.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility
BMOP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMOP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 13.40% | -9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 17.41% | -13.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 21.89% | -18.35% |
BMOP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMOP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than TPYP's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.29% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMOP and TPYP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BMOP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.51% for BMOP.
BMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.40% for TPYP.
Find the right allocation for BMOP and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer