PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMOP vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMOP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMOP

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.08%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TPYP

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.10%
6M
19.48%
YTD
19.91%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
24.34%
5Y*
18.23%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMOP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMOP and TPYP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

-0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMOP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMOP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMOPTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

BMOP vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMOP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum TPYP drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMOPTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-51.91%

+49.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-5.39%

+5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-7.87%

+7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

Volatility

BMOP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMOPTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

13.40%

-9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.54%

17.41%

-13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

21.89%

-18.35%

BMOP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMOP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than TPYP's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMOP
BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF
1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.29%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMOP and TPYP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BMOP.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.51% for BMOP.

BMOP is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.40% for TPYP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMOP and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer