BMOP vs. GUMI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BMOP (BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF) and GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMOP charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GUMI.

Performance

BMOP vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BMOP

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 1.57%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GUMI

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMOP vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF	1.77%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BMOP and GUMI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.21

Return for Risk

BMOP vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GUMI

GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 96
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 95
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMOP vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMOP	GUMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.56	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.61	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	8.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	36.12	—

Drawdowns

BMOP vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMOP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMOP and GUMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMOP	GUMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-0.48%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.67%	-0.05%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMOP	GUMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.19%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.49%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.51%	1.06%	+2.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.51%	0.97%	+2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.51%	0.97%	+2.54%

BMOP vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMOP has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMOP vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

BMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than GUMI's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BMOP BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF	2.73%	2.95%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMOP and GUMI in my portfolio?

BMOP and GUMI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMOP or GUMI?

On fees, GUMI is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMOP or GUMI?

GUMI is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for BMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMOP or GUMI?

GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.52% for BMOP.

What is the main difference between BMOP and GUMI?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BMOP and 0.16% for GUMI.