BMNZ vs. SH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds - BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. while SH tracks the S&P 500 (-100%). Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.

Performance

BMNZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -5.94% return.

BMNZ

• 1D: 22.76%
• 1M: 77.00%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 35.73%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SH

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: -5.94%
• 6M: -5.34%
• 1Y: -15.86%
• 3Y*: -12.35%
• 5Y*: -8.66%
• 10Y*: -12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF	1.13%	-0.49%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-5.94%	-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNZ and SH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

BMNZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNZ	SH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-1.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	-0.58	+0.59

Drawdowns

BMNZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and SH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNZ	SH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.80%	-94.66%	+23.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-38.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.53%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.38%	-94.50%	+51.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.56%	-67.74%	+16.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNZ	SH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	190.13%	12.10%	+178.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	190.13%	16.88%	+173.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	190.13%	18.03%	+172.10%

BMNZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.41%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNZ and SH in my portfolio?

BMNZ and SH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNZ or SH?

On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNZ or SH?

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNZ or SH?

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.

What is the main difference between BMNZ and SH?

BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 0.90% for SH.