BMNG vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). BMNG is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

BMNG vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 7.17%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 32.82%
• 3Y*: 19.84%
• 5Y*: 23.54%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-75.13%	-81.37%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	7.17%	6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and YCS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

BMNG vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 61
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNG vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNG	YCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.52	0.33	-0.85

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNG	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.36%	-49.56%	-45.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.36%	0.00%	-95.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.38%	-19.93%	-61.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNG	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.58%	17.27%	+174.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	191.58%	21.10%	+170.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.58%	19.01%	+172.57%

BMNG vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNG vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor YCS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNG and YCS in my portfolio?

BMNG and YCS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNG or YCS?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNG or YCS?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNG or YCS?

BMNG and YCS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BMNG and YCS?

BMNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 1.00% for YCS.