BMNG vs. UNHU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and UNHU (Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for UNHU.

Performance

BMNG vs. UNHU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BMNG

• 1D: 11.82%
• 1M: -43.79%
• YTD: -72.19%
• 6M: -85.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNHU

• 1D: 10.16%
• 1M: 17.42%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNG vs. UNHU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-38.58%
UNHU Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF	105.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNG and UNHU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.11

Return for Risk

BMNG vs. UNHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Direxion Daily UNH Bull 2X ETF (UNHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMNG	UNHU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.52	57.76	-58.28

Drawdowns

BMNG vs. UNHU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -95.36%, which is greater than UNHU's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and UNHU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMNG	UNHU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.36%	-11.68%	-83.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.82%	-2.71%	-92.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.47%	-2.99%	-78.48%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMNG	UNHU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	191.69%	69.61%	+122.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	191.69%	69.61%	+122.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	191.69%	69.61%	+122.08%

BMNG vs. UNHU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHU's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMNG vs. UNHU - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNG nor UNHU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMNG and UNHU in my portfolio?

BMNG and UNHU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMNG or UNHU?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMNG or UNHU?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for UNHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMNG or UNHU?

BMNG and UNHU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BMNG and UNHU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.97% for UNHU.