BMNG vs. OOSP
BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) and OOSP (Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while OOSP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Obra. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BMNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for OOSP.
Performance
BMNG vs. OOSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNG achieves a -81.21% return, which is significantly lower than OOSP's 2.66% return.
BMNG
- 1D
- -9.13%
- 1M
- -40.34%
- YTD
- -81.21%
- 6M
- -84.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOSP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNG vs. OOSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | -81.21% | -80.50% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 2.66% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNG and OOSP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNG vs. OOSP — Risk / Return Rank
BMNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OOSP
BMNG vs. OOSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG) and Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF (OOSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNG | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNG vs. OOSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNG drawdown since its inception was -96.50%, which is greater than OOSP's maximum drawdown of -1.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNG and OOSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNG | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.50% | -1.31% | -95.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.50% | 0.00% | -96.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.04% | -0.20% | -81.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.35% | — |
Volatility
BMNG vs. OOSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNG | OOSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 189.32% | 3.65% | +185.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 189.32% | 3.32% | +186.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 189.32% | 3.32% | +186.00% |
BMNG vs. OOSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OOSP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNG vs. OOSP - Dividend Comparison
BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OOSP Obra Opportunistic Structured Products ETF | 6.45% | 6.71% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNG and OOSP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for OOSP.
OOSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.
BMNG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOSP is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Obra. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BMNG and 0.90% for OOSP.
Find the right allocation for BMNG and OOSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer