BMN vs. GUIRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX).
BMN is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 28, 2022. GUIRX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010.
Performance
BMN vs. GUIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMN vs. GUIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMN Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust | 1.11% | 7.05% | 12.65% | 1.89% | -2.55% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | -0.25% | 4.73% | 3.66% | 6.37% | 4.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMN achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than GUIRX's -0.25% return.
BMN
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 9.12%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUIRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMN vs. GUIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMN has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GUIRX's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMN vs. GUIRX — Risk / Return Rank
BMN
GUIRX
BMN vs. GUIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) and Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMN | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 0.83 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.24 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.07 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 3.88 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMN | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.83 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.07 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMN and GUIRX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BMN vs. GUIRX - Dividend Comparison
BMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than GUIRX's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMN Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust | 4.30% | 4.30% | 4.40% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 3.76% | 4.90% | 3.86% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.68% |
Drawdowns
BMN vs. GUIRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMN drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum GUIRX drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMN and GUIRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMN | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -14.21% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.92% | -4.51% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.53% | -2.14% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -2.13% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.25% | +0.99% |
Volatility
BMN vs. GUIRX - Volatility Comparison
Blackrock 2037 Municipal Target Term Trust (BMN) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) at 0.93%. This indicates that BMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMN | GUIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 0.93% | +4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 1.53% | +7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.24% | 4.56% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 3.67% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 3.93% | +6.59% |