BMED vs. BLCR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Future Health ETF (BMED) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR).

BMED and BLCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BMED is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. BLCR is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 24, 2023.

Performance

BMED vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future Health ETF (BMED) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BMED vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BMED Future Health ETF	-4.26%	21.79%	1.55%	17.22%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	-1.47%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMED achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's -1.47% return.

BMED

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -5.51%
• YTD: -4.26%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -1.47%
• 6M: 3.77%
• 1Y: 35.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMED vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMED has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

BMED

Future Health ETF

BLCR

Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

BMED vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMED

BMED Risk / Return Rank: 61
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMED vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Health ETF (BMED) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMED	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.70	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.36	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	3.03	-1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	12.57	-7.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMED vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMED and BLCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMED	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.70	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	1.44	-1.31

Correlation

The correlation between BMED and BLCR is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BMED vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

BMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BMED Future Health ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.28%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%

Drawdowns

BMED vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMED drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMED and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMED	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-21.29%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-12.13%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-5.59%	-4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-2.29%	-17.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.92%	+0.70%

Volatility

BMED vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Future Health ETF (BMED) is 5.98%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that BMED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMED	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	7.08%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	12.55%	-1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.24%	21.17%	-2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	17.60%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	17.60%	+0.21%