BMED vs. AGNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Future Health ETF (BMED) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG).

BMED and AGNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BMED is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. AGNG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Aging Population Thematic Index. It was launched on May 9, 2016.

Performance

BMED vs. AGNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Future Health ETF (BMED) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BMED vs. AGNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BMED Future Health ETF	-4.26%	21.79%	1.55%	5.70%	-19.69%	-3.96%	17.86%
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF	0.54%	20.01%	7.03%	9.65%	-8.61%	3.91%	8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMED achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than AGNG's 0.54% return.

BMED

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -5.51%
• YTD: -4.26%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 0.40%
• 10Y*: —

AGNG

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -4.88%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 17.12%
• 3Y*: 11.46%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMED vs. AGNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMED has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AGNG's 0.50% expense ratio.

BMED

Future Health ETF

AGNG

Global X Aging Population ETF

Return for Risk

BMED vs. AGNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMED

BMED Risk / Return Rank: 61
BMED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BMED Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BMED Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BMED Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BMED Martin Ratio Rank: 53

AGNG

AGNG Risk / Return Rank: 56
AGNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
AGNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AGNG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
AGNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AGNG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMED vs. AGNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Health ETF (BMED) and Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BMED	AGNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	1.08	+0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.57	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.20	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	1.61	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	5.49	-0.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BMED vs. AGNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMED Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the AGNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMED and AGNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BMED	AGNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	1.08	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.41	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.58	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between BMED and AGNG is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BMED vs. AGNG - Dividend Comparison

BMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BMED Future Health ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AGNG Global X Aging Population ETF	0.87%	0.88%	0.83%	0.96%	0.49%	0.72%	0.36%	0.83%	1.00%	1.04%	0.45%

Drawdowns

BMED vs. AGNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMED drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than AGNG's maximum drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMED and AGNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMED	AGNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-30.58%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-10.16%	-2.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.90%	-25.66%	-8.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.30%	-6.11%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-5.92%	-13.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	2.98%	+0.64%

Volatility

BMED vs. AGNG - Volatility Comparison

Future Health ETF (BMED) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Global X Aging Population ETF (AGNG) at 5.49%. This indicates that BMED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMED	AGNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	5.49%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	9.55%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.24%	15.99%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	15.10%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	17.17%	+0.64%