PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMCAX vs. APGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMCAX achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than APGYX's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BMCAX has outperformed APGYX with an annualized return of 17.89%, while APGYX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.50% annualized return.


BMCAX

1D
-0.89%
1M
7.16%
YTD
13.02%
6M
11.96%
1Y
34.23%
3Y*
27.90%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
17.89%

APGYX

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.49%
YTD
4.80%
6M
3.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
13.02%21.40%32.28%39.38%-30.37%26.61%31.89%33.39%-2.87%22.57%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
4.80%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between BMCAX and APGYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1996

0.86

The correlation between BMCAX and APGYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMCAX vs. APGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMCAX
BMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMCAXAPGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.02

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

3.80

+4.38

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the APGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMCAX and APGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMCAXAPGYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.09

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.55

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.49

-0.01

Drawdowns

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum APGYX drawdown of -66.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMCAX and APGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMCAXAPGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-66.33%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-15.24%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.29%

-21.59%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.84%

-33.91%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-33.91%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.47%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-21.00%

+11.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.10%

+0.16%

Volatility

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) at 3.31%. This indicates that BMCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMCAXAPGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.31%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

10.94%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

14.38%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

20.16%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

19.67%

+1.44%

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMCAX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than APGYX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMCAX vs. APGYX - Dividend Comparison

BMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than APGYX's 9.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.31%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%
BMCAX
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund
6.14%6.94%22.50%0.79%0.19%14.39%5.68%4.12%9.77%6.04%0.56%7.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BMCAX and APGYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BMCAX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to APGYX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMCAX dropped -58.55% vs APGYX's -66.33%.

BMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMCAX and APGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer