BMCAX vs. TQQQ

In the year-to-date period, BMCAX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, BMCAX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 14.23%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 31.28% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMCAX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMCAX and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.42%, more than TQQQ's 1.41% yield.

The maximum BMCAX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMCAX and TQQQ.

The current volatility for BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Growth Fund (BMCAX) is 5.63%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 16.41%. This indicates that BMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.