PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAY vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMAY vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMAY vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BMAY
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.13%11.16%19.06%16.73%-12.54%9.42%
EAPR
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April
0.61%14.80%2.86%8.19%-5.01%-2.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAY achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 0.61% return.


BMAY

1D
1.80%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
0.13%
6M
2.40%
1Y
13.12%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*

EAPR

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
0.61%
6M
2.49%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMAY vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMAY vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAY
BMAY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAY vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMAYEAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.64

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

2.39

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

1.77

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.23

13.21

-4.98

BMAY vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAY and EAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAYEAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.64

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.36

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between BMAY and EAPR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BMAY vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMAY nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BMAY vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAY drawdown since its inception was -17.66%, roughly equal to the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAY and EAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAYEAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.66%

-17.65%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-6.99%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.97%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-4.18%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.94%

+0.73%

Volatility

BMAY vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (BMAY) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 1.23%. This indicates that BMAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMAYEAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

1.23%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

2.42%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

7.73%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.31%

9.82%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

9.82%

+1.29%