BMAX vs. DRNZ
BMAX (REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMAX is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by REX, while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. BMAX is actively managed, while DRNZ is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMAX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BMAX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ
- 1D
- -6.81%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 24.77%
- 6M
- 32.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMAX REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF | 4.03% | -16.19% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 24.77% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAX and DRNZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Bitcoin Corporate Treasury Convertible Bond ETF (BMAX) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAX | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.39 | — |
Drawdowns
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAX | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -7.44% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.12% | — |
Volatility
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAX | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 50.82% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 50.82% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 50.82% | — |
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAX vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMAX nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAX and DRNZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for BMAX.
BMAX and DRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMAX is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for BMAX and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for BMAX and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer