PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAX.TO vs. AOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while AOK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AOK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than AOK's 7.97% return.


BMAX.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
10.31%
6M
9.34%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
10Y*

AOK

1D
0.58%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.97%
6M
7.62%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.31%17.88%19.43%11.56%5.83%
AOK
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
7.97%6.18%15.60%8.21%3.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAX.TO and AOK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.48

The correlation between BMAX.TO and AOK shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMAX.TO vs. AOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAX.TO
BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

AOK
AOK Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
AOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMAX.TOAOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

3.69

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

11.32

-1.16

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the AOK Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAX.TO and AOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, roughly equal to the maximum AOK drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and AOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAX.TOAOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-15.01%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-3.83%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-7.33%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.11%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-3.46%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.25%

+0.89%

Volatility

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) at 2.72%. This indicates that BMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMAX.TOAOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.72%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

5.86%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

7.39%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

9.39%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.16%

9.26%

+3.90%

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than AOK's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. AOK - Dividend Comparison

BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.50%, more than AOK's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOK
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF
3.29%3.28%3.23%2.93%2.25%1.55%2.10%2.71%2.68%2.91%2.14%2.02%
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
9.50%9.70%9.65%9.55%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMAX.TO and AOK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AOK is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AOK is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 2.62% for BMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Brompton Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.62% for BMAX.TO and 0.15% for AOK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAX.TO and AOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer