PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAR vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMAR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMAR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
-0.47%14.97%16.49%23.09%2.92%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
-3.03%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's -3.03% return.


BMAR

1D
0.59%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
-0.47%
6M
2.22%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*

SFLR

1D
0.85%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-3.03%
6M
-0.93%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMAR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMAR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAR
BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMARSFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.82

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.09

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.48

8.18

+1.30

BMAR vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAR and SFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMARSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.49

-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between BMAR and SFLR is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMAR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


TTM2025202420232022
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.35%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%

Drawdowns

BMAR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and SFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMARSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-12.13%

-9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-6.79%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-4.43%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-1.76%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.73%

-0.05%

Volatility

BMAR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) at 3.79%. This indicates that BMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMARSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.79%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

7.45%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

10.85%

+2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.32%

10.30%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

10.30%

+3.51%