PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAR vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMAR vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMAR vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
-1.06%14.97%7.42%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.


BMAR

1D
2.26%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
1.73%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
14.84%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMAR vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMAR vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAR
BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAR vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMARBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

1.86

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.71

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

9.81

-0.43

BMAR vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAR and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMARBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.02

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between BMAR and BUFP is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMAR vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


Drawdowns

BMAR vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMARBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-11.98%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-8.16%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-2.54%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-1.08%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.42%

+0.25%

Volatility

BMAR vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 3.41%. This indicates that BMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMARBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

3.41%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

4.99%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

11.11%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.32%

9.79%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

9.79%

+4.02%