BMAR vs. BUFF
BMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BMAR tracks the S&P 500 Price Return Index while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BMAR returned 12.18%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
BMAR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
BMAR
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BMAR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 8.62% | 14.97% | 16.49% | 23.09% | -7.06% | 16.79% | 10.88% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAR and BUFF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BMAR and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
BMAR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BMAR
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BMAR
BUFF
Financial Services
BMAR
BUFF
Communication Services
BMAR
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
BMAR
BUFF
Healthcare
BMAR
BUFF
Industrials
BMAR
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
BMAR
BUFF
Energy
BMAR
BUFF
Utilities
BMAR
BUFF
Real Estate
BMAR
BUFF
Basic Materials
BMAR
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
BMAR
BUFF
BMAR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 2.80 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.13 | 4.24 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 4.02 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.88 | 21.50 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.80 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.49 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
BMAR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.43% | -46.23% | +24.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -3.58% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.86% | -10.24% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | -10.24% | -4.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.27% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -6.18% | +3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.67% | +0.34% |
Volatility
BMAR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that BMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.02% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | 3.83% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.39% | 5.15% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.32% | 8.41% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 17.67% | -4.00% |
BMAR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMAR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMAR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMAR has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAR dropped -21.43% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BMAR leads with 12.18% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, BMAR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BMAR has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BMAR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BMAR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMAR tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAR and 0.89% for BUFF.
BMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMAR and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer